ResourcesCase StudiesHow concept testing helped Bloom Baby choose the stronger diaper proposition
Bloom Baby diaper concept research

How concept testing helped Bloom Baby choose the stronger diaper proposition

Flickly ran a concept evaluation study with mothers across Mumbai, Chennai, and Delhi NCR to understand which of two diaper propositions had the strongest consumer footing.

Explore the findingsExplore the findings

Four findings that shaped the launch decision

0
Composite Concept ScoreFor Skin-Safe Diapers, the winning proposition across intent, believability, and fit
0%
Ingredient uncertaintyOf current diaper users cited it as their biggest complaint
0%
Switch propensityTop-2-box switch propensity after seeing both Bloom Baby concepts
0%
Relevance-driven intentOf Skin-Safe intenders chose it because it spoke to a real concern

A trusted personal care brand exploring an extension into baby care

The Client

Bloom is an established D2C personal care brand known for cleaner ingredients, transparent formulation, and products designed for sensitive skin, with existing equity among urban, educated women, many of whom are also entering motherhood.

The Brief

The baby diaper market is dominated by large incumbent brands, and parents do not switch easily once they trust a product. Before investing in product development and launch planning, Bloom needed consumer evidence on which proposition had the strongest foundation.

Four questions the research was designed to answer

The verdict
Which diaper concept is stronger, and why?
The gap
What does the current category fail to deliver?
The consumer
Do expecting mothers and new mothers respond differently?
The brand
Does Bloom's personal care equity transfer credibly into baby care?

A framework designed to look beyond stated purchase intent

In baby care research, purchase intent can be overstated because parents naturally want to appear open to products that may benefit their child. Flickly's evaluation framework looked beyond stated intent and placed more weight on believability, relevance, feature fit, and direct comparison.

01

Concept evaluation

Each respondent reviewed both diaper concepts independently before comparing them directly, surfacing genuine preference beyond first impression.

02

Composite scoring

Concepts were assessed using a balanced framework covering purchase interest, believability, feature relevance, and distinctiveness, not stated intent alone.

03

Feature-to-priority mapping

Selected features were compared against each mother's own stated diaper purchase priorities to test genuine fit, not just appeal.

04

Target audience screening

The study focused on expecting mothers and new mothers in major metro markets who were aware of the Bloom brand.

Skin-Safe won the comparison, but the more important finding was why

  • Skin-Safe won direct preference at 42.2% vs 34.3%, holding up better once mothers compared both propositions side by side.
  • 38.2% of Skin-Safe intenders chose it because it addressed a real concern, safe materials and skin comfort, making the intent more durable.
  • Ingredient uncertainty was the clearest category gap, cited by 44.3% of current diaper users as their biggest complaint.
  • Expecting mothers responded more emotionally to Zero Irritation, while new mothers found Skin-Safe more practically relevant.

Frequently Asked Questions

Baby care products are used on infants, often every day and for long periods. Parents are naturally cautious because the perceived risk of a wrong choice is high. Comfort, safety, gentleness, and visible product performance matter more than novelty.
Parents usually look for a combination of comfort, skin safety, dryness, leak protection, and fit. In this category, emotional reassurance and functional proof both matter.
Parents are becoming more aware of what goes into products used on their babies. Brands that explain what their products contain, and why those choices are safer or gentler, can build stronger trust.
Sampling is especially important because parents want to see how the product works for their own baby before committing. A sample reduces perceived risk and gives parents direct proof of comfort, fit, absorbency, and skin compatibility.
Skin-Safe was stronger because it addressed a clear concern in the category: whether diaper materials are safe and gentle for a baby's skin. Its appeal was rooted in relevance, not just brand trust, making the proposition more durable and better suited for launch.

Turn consumer opinions into confident market decisions

Get market-ready consumer insights in as little as 72 hours.

Book a demo todayBook a demo today