ResourcesCase StudiesHow Indian skincare brands can win at the shelf with smarter serum naming and ingredient communication
Skincare serum naming research

How Indian skincare brands can win at the shelf with smarter serum naming and ingredient communication

A leading D2C skincare brand worked with Flickly to find out which serum names and ingredient claims actually convert young urban Indians, and which ones lose them before they even read the label.

Explore the findingsExplore the findings

Five findings that reshaped how the brand names and labels its serums

0B
Market by 2027Projected size of India's skincare market in USD, with serums the fastest-growing subcategory
0%+
Content-led discoveryOf purchase decisions influenced by online content and ingredient claims
0%
Liposomal confusionOf respondents were unfamiliar with or unclear about liposomal technology
0
Trust-anchor ingredientsSalicylic acid, Vitamin C, and Niacinamide carry the strongest purchase-ready credibility

A science-led D2C brand questioning whether its naming language was working

The Client

A science-led D2C skincare brand with an ingredient-transparency positioning needed ground-truth data on how young urban Indians actually process serum names and ingredient claims, after category naming drifted toward abstract language like Glow Boost and Skin Balancing.

The Brief

The brand needed to know which serum names win for each skin concern, which ingredients carry the most purchase-ready credibility, where the knowledge gaps sit, and whether skin type, gender, or city changes what works.

Five questions that defined the research

The name
Which serum names win for each skin concern, and why?
The ingredient
Which ingredients carry the most purchase-ready credibility?
The gap
Where are the ingredient knowledge gaps, and how can they be closed?
The segment
Does skin type, gender, or city change what works?

A concern-routed quantitative study built to test naming and ingredient claims the way consumers actually shop

Flickly conducted a quantitative consumer study among urban Indian serum users aged 18 to 25, routing respondents into concern-specific modules and analysing results across skin type, gender, and city to determine whether a unified national naming strategy was viable.

01

Concern-routed survey design

Respondents were routed into concern-specific modules based on their top skin concerns, evaluating name options, reasons for preference, and perceived ingredient effectiveness within each module.

02

Audience and reach

A quantitative study among urban Indian serum users aged 18 to 25, spanning major metro markets, representing the premium D2C skincare category.

03

Name and ingredient evaluation

Within each concern module, respondents evaluated competing name options for preference, and rated perceived effectiveness of the ingredients carried in each.

04

Cross-segment analysis

Results were analysed across skin type, gender, and city to determine whether a unified national naming strategy was viable, or whether segmentation was required.

Name it like the consumer, not the chemist

  • Across every concern module tested, names that stated the problem or expected outcome outperformed names built on abstract or aspirational language, by wide margins.
  • Glow-led names placed last in every module they appeared in: glow works as a supporting cue in the story, not as the primary product name.
  • Salicylic acid, Vitamin C, and Niacinamide do most of the trust-building work and need prominent placement as front-of-pack proof anchors.
  • Newer ingredients like Tranexamic acid and PDRN cannot stand alone: every use must be paired with a plain-language outcome statement.

Frequently Asked Questions

Direct, problem-solution coded names consistently outperform abstract alternatives. Top performers across high-incidence concern modules included names built around brightening, dark spot clearing, anti-acne, hydrating, and oil control language.
Salicylic acid, Vitamin C, and Niacinamide carry the strongest purchase-ready credibility in this demographic. Hyaluronic acid leads for hydration. Ceramides lead for barrier and ageing concerns. These are the anchor ingredients that convert without requiring education.
Always pair the ingredient name with a plain-language benefit statement. The knowledge gap is a conversion opportunity, not a reason to avoid the ingredient.
Naming can largely be standardised nationally. City-level differences are more relevant for competitive messaging and media targeting than for product naming.
Always as technology plus benefit, never technology alone. “Liposomal delivery for deeper active absorption” works. “Liposomal” as a standalone claim reaches most of the audience as noise.

Turn consumer opinions into confident market decisions

Get market-ready consumer insights in as little as 72 hours.

Book a demo todayBook a demo today